Merge branch 'main' into sure-9548-keycloak

2026-09-25 20:48:11 +00:00 · 2025-02-12 13:43:06 -08:00
parent b6118a3049 9a009bfcdf
commit 51ae9ac9ea
51 changed files with 490 additions and 78 deletions
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Rancher will publish deprecated features as part of the [release notes](https://

 | Patch Version |  Release Date |
 |---------------|---------------|
+| [2.10.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.10.2) | Jan 29, 2025 |
+| [2.10.1](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.10.1) | Dec 19, 2024 |
 | [2.10.0](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.10.0) | Nov 18, 2024 |

 ## What can I expect when a feature is marked for deprecation?
@@ -91,11 +91,11 @@ The UI consists of static files, and works based on responses of the API. That m

 ## The IP address of a node changed, how can I recover?

-A node is required to have a static IP configured (or a reserved IP via DHCP). If the IP of a node has changed, you will have to remove it from the cluster and readd it. After it is removed, Rancher will update the cluster to the correct state. If the cluster is no longer in `Provisioning` state, the node is removed from the cluster.
+A node is required to have a static IP configured (or a reserved IP via DHCP). If the IP of a node has changed, you will have to remove it from the cluster and add it again. After it is removed, Rancher will update the cluster to the correct state. If the cluster is no longer in `Provisioning` state, the node is removed from the cluster.

 When the IP address of the node changed, Rancher lost connection to the node, so it will be unable to clean the node properly. See [Cleaning cluster nodes](../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/manage-clusters/clean-cluster-nodes.md) to clean the node.

-When the node is removed from the cluster, and the node is cleaned, you can readd the node to the cluster.
+When the node is removed from the cluster, and the node is cleaned, you can add the node to the cluster.

 ## How can I add more arguments/binds/environment variables to Kubernetes components in a Rancher Launched Kubernetes cluster?

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Some feature flags require a restart of the Rancher container. Features that req

 The following is a list of feature flags available in Rancher. If you've upgraded from a previous Rancher version, you may see additional flags in the Rancher UI, such as `proxy` or `dashboard` (both [discontinued](/versioned_docs/version-2.5/reference-guides/installation-references/feature-flags.md)):

+- `clean-stale-secrets`: Removes stale secrets from the `cattle-impersonation-system` namespace. This slowly cleans up old secrets which are no longer being used by the impersonation system.
 - `continuous-delivery`: Allows Fleet GitOps to be disabled separately from Fleet. See [Continuous Delivery.](../../../how-to-guides/advanced-user-guides/enable-experimental-features/continuous-delivery.md) for more information.
 - `fleet`: The Rancher provisioning framework in v2.6 and later requires Fleet. The flag will be automatically enabled when you upgrade, even if you disabled this flag in an earlier version of Rancher. See [Continuous Delivery with Fleet](../../../integrations-in-rancher/fleet/fleet.md) for more information.
 - `harvester`: Manages access to the Virtualization Management page, where users can navigate directly to Harvester clusters and access the Harvester UI. See [Harvester Integration Overview](../../../integrations-in-rancher/harvester/overview.md) for more information.
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ The following table shows the availability and default values for some feature f

 | Feature Flag Name             | Default Value | Status       | Available As Of | Additional Information |
 | ----------------------------- | ------------- | ------------ | --------------- | ---------------------- |
+| `clean-stale-secrets` | `true` | GA | v2.10.2 | |
 | `continuous-delivery` | `true` | GA | v2.6.0 | |
 | `external-rules` | v2.7.14: `false`, v2.8.5: `true` | Removed | v2.7.14, v2.8.5 | This flag affected [external `RoleTemplate` behavior](../../../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/authentication-permissions-and-global-configuration/manage-role-based-access-control-rbac/cluster-and-project-roles.md#external-roletemplate-behavior). It is removed in Rancher v2.9.0 and later as the behavior is enabled by default. |
 | `fleet`  | `true` | Can no longer be disabled | v2.6.0 | |
@@ -178,3 +178,19 @@ On the **Configure a Keycloak OIDC account** form, change **Endpoints** to `Spec
 ### Keycloak Error: "Invalid grant_type"

 In some cases, this error message may be misleading and is caused by setting the `Valid Redirect URI` incorrectly.
+
+### Unable to See Groups When Assigning Global Roles
+
+If you use a user that is not part of any groups for initial setup, then you cannot search for groups when trying to assign a global role. 
+To resolve this, you can either:
+
+1. Manually edit the `authconfig/keycloakoidc` object to enable group search.
+  
+    1. On the Rancher server:
+     ```bash
+     kubectl edit authconfigs.management.cattle.io keycloakoidc
+     ```
+    2. Set `groupSearchEnabled: true`.
+    3. Save your changes.
+ 
+2. Reconfigure your Keycloak OIDC setup using a user that is assigned to at least one group in Keycloak.
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ Since, by default, Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) doesn't grant the `cluster-adm

 To successfully import or provision EKS, AKS, and GKE clusters from Rancher, the cluster must have at least one managed node group. 

+AKS clusters can be imported only if local accounts are enabled. If a cluster is configured to use Microsoft Entra ID for authentication, then Rancher will not be able to import it and report an error.
+
 EKS Anywhere clusters can be imported/registered into Rancher with an API address and credentials, as with any downstream cluster. EKS Anywhere clusters are treated as imported clusters and do not have full lifecycle support from Rancher. 

 GKE Autopilot clusters aren't supported. See [Compare GKE Autopilot and Standard](https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/resources/autopilot-standard-feature-comparison) for more information about the differences between GKE modes.
@@ -286,3 +288,20 @@ To annotate a registered cluster,
 6. Click **Save**.

 **Result:** The annotation does not give the capabilities to the cluster, but it does indicate to Rancher that the cluster has those capabilities.
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+This section lists some of the most common errors that may occur when importing a cluster, along with steps to troubleshoot them.
+
+### AKS
+
+- The following error may occur if local accounts are disabled in your cluster.
+  ```sh
+  Error: Getting static credential is not allowed because this cluster is set to disable local accounts.
+  ```
+
+  To resolve this issue, enable local accounts before attempting to [import the cluster](#registering-a-cluster) again.
+
+  ```sh
+  az aks update --resource-group <resource-group> --name <cluster-name> --enable-local-accounts
+  ```
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ In order to deploy and run the adapter successfully, you need to ensure its vers

 | Rancher Version | Adapter Version  |
 |-----------------|------------------|
+| v2.10.2         | v105.0.0+up5.0.1 |
+| v2.10.1         | v105.0.0+up5.0.1 |
 | v2.10.0         | v105.0.0+up5.0.1 |

 ### 1. Gain Access to the Local Cluster
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ title: AKS Cluster Configuration Reference

 ## Role-based Access Control

-When provisioning an AKS cluster in the Rancher UI, RBAC cannot be disabled. If role-based access control is disabled for the cluster in AKS, the cluster cannot be registered or imported into Rancher.
+When provisioning an AKS cluster in the Rancher UI, RBAC cannot be disabled. If role-based access control is disabled for the cluster in AKS, the cluster cannot be registered or imported into Rancher. In practice, this means that local accounts must be enabled in order to register an AKS cluster.

 Rancher can configure member roles for AKS clusters in the same way as any other cluster. For more information, see the section on [role-based access control.](../../../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/authentication-permissions-and-global-configuration/manage-role-based-access-control-rbac/manage-role-based-access-control-rbac.md)

@@ -10,7 +10,12 @@ Rancher is committed to informing the community of security issues in our produc

 | ID | Description | Date | Resolution |
 |----|-------------|------|------------|
-[CVE-2024-22030](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4) | A high severity vulnerability was discovered in Rancher's agents that under very specific circumstances allows a malicious actor to take over existing Rancher nodes. The attacker needs to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain in order to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL (the `server-url` of the Rancher cluster). | 19 Sep 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2), [v2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) and [v2.7.15](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.15) |
+| [CVE-2024-52281](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-2v2w-8v8c-wcm9) | A high severity vulnerability was identified within the Rancher UI that allows a malicious actor to perform a Stored XSS attack through the cluster description field. | 15 Jan 2025 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.10.0](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.10.0) |
+| [CVE-2024-52282](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9c5p-35gj-jqp4) | A medium severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher Manager whereby applications installed via Rancher Manager Apps Catalog store their Helm values directly into the Apps Custom Resource Definition, resulting in any users with GET access to it to be able to read any sensitive information that are contained within the Apps’ values. Additionally, the same information leaks into auditing logs when the audit level is set to equal or above 2. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 19 Nov 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10). |
+| [CVE-2024-22036](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher where a cluster or node driver can be used to escape the `chroot` jail and gain root access to the Rancher container itself. In production environments, further privilege escalation is possible based on living off the land within the Rancher container itself. For test and development environments, based on a –privileged Docker container, it is possible to escape the Docker container and gain execution access on the host system. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3), [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) and [v2.7.16](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.16) |
+| [CVE-2023-32197](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered whereby Rancher Manager deployments containing Windows nodes have weak Access Control Lists (ACL), allowing `BUILTIN\Users` or `NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users` to view or edit sensitive files which could lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is exclusive to deployments that contain Windows nodes. Linux-only environments are not affected by it. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**.  | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2022-45157](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered in the way that Rancher stores vSphere's CPI (Cloud Provider Interface) and CSI (Container Storage Interface) credentials used to deploy clusters through the vSphere cloud provider. This issue leads to the vSphere CPI and CSI passwords being stored in a plaintext object inside Rancher. This vulnerability is only applicable to users that deploy clusters in vSphere environments. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2024-22030](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4) | A high severity vulnerability was discovered in Rancher's agents that under very specific circumstances allows a malicious actor to take over existing Rancher nodes. The attacker needs to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain in order to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL (the `server-url` of the Rancher cluster). | 19 Sep 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2), [v2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) and [v2.7.15](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.15) |
 | [CVE-2024-22032](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-q6c7-56cq-g2wm) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where custom secrets encryption configurations are stored in plaintext under the clusters `AppliedSpec`. This also causes clusters to continuously reconcile, as the `AppliedSpec` would never match the desired cluster `Spec`. The stored information contains the encryption configuration for secrets within etcd, and could potentially expose sensitive data if the etcd database was exposed directly. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
 | [CVE-2023-32196](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-64jq-m7rq-768h) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where the webhook rule resolver ignores rules from a `ClusterRole` for an external `RoleTemplate` set with `.context=project` or `.context=""`. This allows a user to create an external `ClusterRole` with `.context=project` or `.context=""`, depending on the use of the new feature flag `external-rules` and backing `ClusterRole`. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
 | [CVE-2023-22650](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9ghh-mmcq-8phc) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where Rancher did not have a user retention process for when external authentication providers are used, that could be configured to run periodically and disable and/or delete inactive users. The new user retention process added in Rancher v2.8.5 and Rancher v2.7.14 is disabled by default. If enabled, a user becomes subject to the retention process if they don't log in for a configurable period of time. It's possible to set overrides for user accounts that are primarily intended for programmatic access (e.g. CI, scripts, etc.) so that they don't become subject to the retention process for a longer period of time or at all. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Each Rancher version is designed to be compatible with a single version of the w

 | Rancher Version | Webhook Version | Availability in Prime | Availability in Community |
 |-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|
+| v2.10.2         |     v0.6.3      | &check;               | &check;                   |
+| v2.10.1         |     v0.6.2      | &check;               | &check;                   |
 | v2.10.0         |     v0.6.1      | &cross;               | &check;                   |

 ## Why Do We Need It?
@@ -10,11 +10,12 @@ Rancher is committed to informing the community of security issues in our produc

 | ID | Description | Date | Resolution |
 |----|-------------|------|------------|
-[CVE-2024-52282](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9c5p-35gj-jqp4) | A medium severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher Manager whereby applications installed via Rancher Manager Apps Catalog store their Helm values directly into the Apps Custom Resource Definition, resulting in any users with GET access to it to be able to read any sensitive information that are contained within the Apps’ values. Additionally, the same information leaks into auditing logs when the audit level is set to equal or above 2. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 19 Nov 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10). |
-[CVE-2024-22036](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher where a cluster or node driver can be used to escape the `chroot` jail and gain root access to the Rancher container itself. In production environments, further privilege escalation is possible based on living off the land within the Rancher container itself. For test and development environments, based on a –privileged Docker container, it is possible to escape the Docker container and gain execution access on the host system. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3), [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) and [v2.7.16](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.16) |
-[CVE-2023-32197](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered whereby Rancher Manager deployments containing Windows nodes have weak Access Control Lists (ACL), allowing `BUILTIN\Users` or `NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users` to view or edit sensitive files which could lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is exclusive to deployments that contain Windows nodes. Linux-only environments are not affected by it. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**.  | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
-[CVE-2022-45157](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered in the way that Rancher stores vSphere's CPI (Cloud Provider Interface) and CSI (Container Storage Interface) credentials used to deploy clusters through the vSphere cloud provider. This issue leads to the vSphere CPI and CSI passwords being stored in a plaintext object inside Rancher. This vulnerability is only applicable to users that deploy clusters in vSphere environments. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
-[CVE-2024-22030](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4) | A high severity vulnerability was discovered in Rancher's agents that under very specific circumstances allows a malicious actor to take over existing Rancher nodes. The attacker needs to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain in order to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL (the `server-url` of the Rancher cluster). | 19 Sep 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2), [v2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) and [v2.7.15](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.15) |
+| [CVE-2024-52281](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-2v2w-8v8c-wcm9) | A high severity vulnerability was identified within the Rancher UI that allows a malicious actor to perform a Stored XSS attack through the cluster description field. | 15 Jan 2025 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.10.0](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.10.0) |
+| [CVE-2024-52282](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9c5p-35gj-jqp4) | A medium severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher Manager whereby applications installed via Rancher Manager Apps Catalog store their Helm values directly into the Apps Custom Resource Definition, resulting in any users with GET access to it to be able to read any sensitive information that are contained within the Apps’ values. Additionally, the same information leaks into auditing logs when the audit level is set to equal or above 2. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 19 Nov 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10). |
+| [CVE-2024-22036](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher where a cluster or node driver can be used to escape the `chroot` jail and gain root access to the Rancher container itself. In production environments, further privilege escalation is possible based on living off the land within the Rancher container itself. For test and development environments, based on a –privileged Docker container, it is possible to escape the Docker container and gain execution access on the host system. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3), [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) and [v2.7.16](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.16) |
+| [CVE-2023-32197](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered whereby Rancher Manager deployments containing Windows nodes have weak Access Control Lists (ACL), allowing `BUILTIN\Users` or `NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users` to view or edit sensitive files which could lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is exclusive to deployments that contain Windows nodes. Linux-only environments are not affected by it. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**.  | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2022-45157](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered in the way that Rancher stores vSphere's CPI (Cloud Provider Interface) and CSI (Container Storage Interface) credentials used to deploy clusters through the vSphere cloud provider. This issue leads to the vSphere CPI and CSI passwords being stored in a plaintext object inside Rancher. This vulnerability is only applicable to users that deploy clusters in vSphere environments. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2024-22030](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4) | A high severity vulnerability was discovered in Rancher's agents that under very specific circumstances allows a malicious actor to take over existing Rancher nodes. The attacker needs to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain in order to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL (the `server-url` of the Rancher cluster). | 19 Sep 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2), [v2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) and [v2.7.15](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.15) |
 | [CVE-2024-22032](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-q6c7-56cq-g2wm) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where custom secrets encryption configurations are stored in plaintext under the clusters `AppliedSpec`. This also causes clusters to continuously reconcile, as the `AppliedSpec` would never match the desired cluster `Spec`. The stored information contains the encryption configuration for secrets within etcd, and could potentially expose sensitive data if the etcd database was exposed directly. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
 | [CVE-2023-32196](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-64jq-m7rq-768h) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where the webhook rule resolver ignores rules from a `ClusterRole` for an external `RoleTemplate` set with `.context=project` or `.context=""`. This allows a user to create an external `ClusterRole` with `.context=project` or `.context=""`, depending on the use of the new feature flag `external-rules` and backing `ClusterRole`. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
 | [CVE-2023-22650](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9ghh-mmcq-8phc) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where Rancher did not have a user retention process for when external authentication providers are used, that could be configured to run periodically and disable and/or delete inactive users. The new user retention process added in Rancher v2.8.5 and Rancher v2.7.14 is disabled by default. If enabled, a user becomes subject to the retention process if they don't log in for a configurable period of time. It's possible to set overrides for user accounts that are primarily intended for programmatic access (e.g. CI, scripts, etc.) so that they don't become subject to the retention process for a longer period of time or at all. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Rancher will publish deprecated features as part of the [release notes](https://

 | Patch Version |  Release Date |
 |---------------|---------------|
+| [2.8.12](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.12) | Jan 29, 2025 |
+| [2.8.11](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.11) | Dec 18, 2024 |
 | [2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10) | Nov 18, 2024 |
 | [2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) | Oct 24, 2024 |
 | [2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) | Sep 19, 2024 |
@@ -91,11 +91,11 @@ The UI consists of static files, and works based on responses of the API. That m

 ## The IP address of a node changed, how can I recover?

-A node is required to have a static IP configured (or a reserved IP via DHCP). If the IP of a node has changed, you will have to remove it from the cluster and readd it. After it is removed, Rancher will update the cluster to the correct state. If the cluster is no longer in `Provisioning` state, the node is removed from the cluster.
+A node is required to have a static IP configured (or a reserved IP via DHCP). If the IP of a node has changed, you will have to remove it from the cluster and add it again. After it is removed, Rancher will update the cluster to the correct state. If the cluster is no longer in `Provisioning` state, the node is removed from the cluster.

 When the IP address of the node changed, Rancher lost connection to the node, so it will be unable to clean the node properly. See [Cleaning cluster nodes](../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/manage-clusters/clean-cluster-nodes.md) to clean the node.

-When the node is removed from the cluster, and the node is cleaned, you can readd the node to the cluster.
+When the node is removed from the cluster, and the node is cleaned, you can add the node to the cluster.

 ## How can I add more arguments/binds/environment variables to Kubernetes components in a Rancher Launched Kubernetes cluster?

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ In order to deploy and run the adapter successfully, you need to ensure its vers

 | Rancher Version | Adapter Version  |
 |-----------------|------------------|
+| v2.8.12         | v103.0.1+up3.0.1 |
+| v2.8.11         | v103.0.1+up3.0.1 |
 | v2.8.10         | v103.0.1+up3.0.1 |
 | v2.8.9          | v103.0.1+up3.0.1 |
 | v2.8.8          | v103.0.1+up3.0.1 |
@@ -10,11 +10,12 @@ Rancher is committed to informing the community of security issues in our produc

 | ID | Description | Date | Resolution |
 |----|-------------|------|------------|
-[CVE-2024-52282](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9c5p-35gj-jqp4) | A medium severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher Manager whereby applications installed via Rancher Manager Apps Catalog store their Helm values directly into the Apps Custom Resource Definition, resulting in any users with GET access to it to be able to read any sensitive information that are contained within the Apps’ values. Additionally, the same information leaks into auditing logs when the audit level is set to equal or above 2. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 19 Nov 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10). |
-[CVE-2024-22036](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher where a cluster or node driver can be used to escape the `chroot` jail and gain root access to the Rancher container itself. In production environments, further privilege escalation is possible based on living off the land within the Rancher container itself. For test and development environments, based on a –privileged Docker container, it is possible to escape the Docker container and gain execution access on the host system. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3), [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) and [v2.7.16](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.16) |
-[CVE-2023-32197](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered whereby Rancher Manager deployments containing Windows nodes have weak Access Control Lists (ACL), allowing `BUILTIN\Users` or `NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users` to view or edit sensitive files which could lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is exclusive to deployments that contain Windows nodes. Linux-only environments are not affected by it. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**.  | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
-[CVE-2022-45157](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered in the way that Rancher stores vSphere's CPI (Cloud Provider Interface) and CSI (Container Storage Interface) credentials used to deploy clusters through the vSphere cloud provider. This issue leads to the vSphere CPI and CSI passwords being stored in a plaintext object inside Rancher. This vulnerability is only applicable to users that deploy clusters in vSphere environments. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
-[CVE-2024-22030](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4) | A high severity vulnerability was discovered in Rancher's agents that under very specific circumstances allows a malicious actor to take over existing Rancher nodes. The attacker needs to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain in order to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL (the `server-url` of the Rancher cluster). | 19 Sep 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2), [v2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) and [v2.7.15](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.15) |
+| [CVE-2024-52281](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-2v2w-8v8c-wcm9) | A high severity vulnerability was identified within the Rancher UI that allows a malicious actor to perform a Stored XSS attack through the cluster description field. | 15 Jan 2025 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.10.0](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.10.0) |
+| [CVE-2024-52282](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9c5p-35gj-jqp4) | A medium severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher Manager whereby applications installed via Rancher Manager Apps Catalog store their Helm values directly into the Apps Custom Resource Definition, resulting in any users with GET access to it to be able to read any sensitive information that are contained within the Apps’ values. Additionally, the same information leaks into auditing logs when the audit level is set to equal or above 2. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 19 Nov 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10). |
+| [CVE-2024-22036](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher where a cluster or node driver can be used to escape the `chroot` jail and gain root access to the Rancher container itself. In production environments, further privilege escalation is possible based on living off the land within the Rancher container itself. For test and development environments, based on a –privileged Docker container, it is possible to escape the Docker container and gain execution access on the host system. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3), [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) and [v2.7.16](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.16) |
+| [CVE-2023-32197](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered whereby Rancher Manager deployments containing Windows nodes have weak Access Control Lists (ACL), allowing `BUILTIN\Users` or `NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users` to view or edit sensitive files which could lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is exclusive to deployments that contain Windows nodes. Linux-only environments are not affected by it. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**.  | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2022-45157](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered in the way that Rancher stores vSphere's CPI (Cloud Provider Interface) and CSI (Container Storage Interface) credentials used to deploy clusters through the vSphere cloud provider. This issue leads to the vSphere CPI and CSI passwords being stored in a plaintext object inside Rancher. This vulnerability is only applicable to users that deploy clusters in vSphere environments. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2024-22030](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4) | A high severity vulnerability was discovered in Rancher's agents that under very specific circumstances allows a malicious actor to take over existing Rancher nodes. The attacker needs to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain in order to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL (the `server-url` of the Rancher cluster). | 19 Sep 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2), [v2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) and [v2.7.15](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.15) |
 | [CVE-2024-22032](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-q6c7-56cq-g2wm) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where custom secrets encryption configurations are stored in plaintext under the clusters `AppliedSpec`. This also causes clusters to continuously reconcile, as the `AppliedSpec` would never match the desired cluster `Spec`. The stored information contains the encryption configuration for secrets within etcd, and could potentially expose sensitive data if the etcd database was exposed directly. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
 | [CVE-2023-32196](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-64jq-m7rq-768h) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where the webhook rule resolver ignores rules from a `ClusterRole` for an external `RoleTemplate` set with `.context=project` or `.context=""`. This allows a user to create an external `ClusterRole` with `.context=project` or `.context=""`, depending on the use of the new feature flag `external-rules` and backing `ClusterRole`. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
 | [CVE-2023-22650](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9ghh-mmcq-8phc) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.7.13 and 2.8.4, where Rancher did not have a user retention process for when external authentication providers are used, that could be configured to run periodically and disable and/or delete inactive users. The new user retention process added in Rancher v2.8.5 and Rancher v2.7.14 is disabled by default. If enabled, a user becomes subject to the retention process if they don't log in for a configurable period of time. It's possible to set overrides for user accounts that are primarily intended for programmatic access (e.g. CI, scripts, etc.) so that they don't become subject to the retention process for a longer period of time or at all. | 17 Jun 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.5) and [v2.7.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.14) |
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Each Rancher version is designed to be compatible with a single version of the w

 | Rancher Version | Webhook Version | Availability in Prime | Availability in Community |
 |-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|
+| v2.8.12         |     v0.4.15     | &check;               | &cross;                   |
+| v2.8.11         |     v0.4.14     | &check;               | &cross;                   |
 | v2.8.10         |     v0.4.13     | &check;               | &cross;                   |
 | v2.8.9          |     v0.4.12     | &check;               | &cross;                   |
 | v2.8.8          |     v0.4.11     | &check;               | &cross;                   |
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Rancher will publish deprecated features as part of the [release notes](https://

 | Patch Version |  Release Date |
 |---------------|---------------|
+| [2.9.6](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.6) | Jan 29, 2025 |
+| [2.9.5](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.5) | Dec 19, 2024 |
 | [2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) | Nov 18, 2024 |
 | [2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) | Oct 24, 2024 |
 | [2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2) | Sep 19, 2024 |
@@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ The UI consists of static files, and works based on responses of the API. That m

 ## The IP address of a node changed, how can I recover?

-A node is required to have a static IP configured (or a reserved IP via DHCP). If the IP of a node has changed, you will have to remove it from the cluster and readd it. After it is removed, Rancher will update the cluster to the correct state. If the cluster is no longer in `Provisioning` state, the node is removed from the cluster.
+A node is required to have a static IP configured (or a reserved IP via DHCP). If the IP of a node has changed, you will have to remove it from the cluster and add it again. After it is removed, Rancher will update the cluster to the correct state. If the cluster is no longer in `Provisioning` state, the node is removed from the cluster.

 When the IP address of the node changed, Rancher lost connection to the node, so it will be unable to clean the node properly. See [Cleaning cluster nodes](../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/manage-clusters/clean-cluster-nodes.md) to clean the node.

-When the node is removed from the cluster, and the node is cleaned, you can readd the node to the cluster.
+When the node is removed from the cluster, and the node is cleaned, you can add the node to the cluster.

 ## How can I add more arguments/binds/environment variables to Kubernetes components in a Rancher Launched Kubernetes cluster?

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Some feature flags require a restart of the Rancher container. Features that req

 The following is a list of feature flags available in Rancher. If you've upgraded from a previous Rancher version, you may see additional flags in the Rancher UI, such as `proxy` or `dashboard` (both [discontinued](/versioned_docs/version-2.5/reference-guides/installation-references/feature-flags.md)):

+- `clean-stale-secrets`: Removes stale secrets from the `cattle-impersonation-system` namespace. This slowly cleans up old secrets which are no longer being used by the impersonation system.
 - `continuous-delivery`: Allows Fleet GitOps to be disabled separately from Fleet. See [Continuous Delivery.](../../../how-to-guides/advanced-user-guides/enable-experimental-features/continuous-delivery.md) for more information.
 - `fleet`: The Rancher provisioning framework in v2.6 and later requires Fleet. The flag will be automatically enabled when you upgrade, even if you disabled this flag in an earlier version of Rancher. See [Continuous Delivery with Fleet](../../../integrations-in-rancher/fleet/fleet.md) for more information.
 - `harvester`: Manages access to the Virtualization Management page, where users can navigate directly to Harvester clusters and access the Harvester UI. See [Harvester Integration Overview](../../../integrations-in-rancher/harvester/overview.md) for more information.
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ The following table shows the availability and default values for some feature f

 | Feature Flag Name             | Default Value | Status       | Available As Of | Additional Information |
 | ----------------------------- | ------------- | ------------ | --------------- | ---------------------- |
+| `clean-stale-secrets` | `true` | GA | v2.9.6 | |
 | `continuous-delivery` | `true` | GA | v2.6.0 | |
 | `external-rules` | v2.7.14: `false`, v2.8.5: `true` | Removed | v2.7.14, v2.8.5 | This flag affected [external `RoleTemplate` behavior](../../../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/authentication-permissions-and-global-configuration/manage-role-based-access-control-rbac/cluster-and-project-roles.md#external-roletemplate-behavior). It is removed in Rancher v2.9.0 and later as the behavior is enabled by default. |
 | `fleet`  | `true` | Can no longer be disabled | v2.6.0 | |
@@ -178,3 +178,19 @@ On the **Configure a Keycloak OIDC account** form, change **Endpoints** to `Spec
 ### Keycloak Error: "Invalid grant_type"

 In some cases, this error message may be misleading and is caused by setting the `Valid Redirect URI` incorrectly.
+
+### Unable to See Groups When Assigning Global Roles
+
+If you use a user that is not part of any groups for initial setup, then you cannot search for groups when trying to assign a global role. 
+To resolve this, you can either:
+
+1. Manually edit the `authconfig/keycloakoidc` object to enable group search.
+  
+    1. On the Rancher server:
+     ```bash
+     kubectl edit authconfigs.management.cattle.io keycloakoidc
+     ```
+    2. Set `groupSearchEnabled: true`.
+    3. Save your changes.
+ 
+2. Reconfigure your Keycloak OIDC setup using a user that is assigned to at least one group in Keycloak.
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ Since, by default, Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) doesn't grant the `cluster-adm

 To successfully import or provision EKS, AKS, and GKE clusters from Rancher, the cluster must have at least one managed node group. 

+AKS clusters can be imported only if local accounts are enabled. If a cluster is configured to use Microsoft Entra ID for authentication, then Rancher will not be able to import it and report an error.
+
 EKS Anywhere clusters can be imported/registered into Rancher with an API address and credentials, as with any downstream cluster. EKS Anywhere clusters are treated as imported clusters and do not have full lifecycle support from Rancher. 

 GKE Autopilot clusters aren't supported. See [Compare GKE Autopilot and Standard](https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/resources/autopilot-standard-feature-comparison) for more information about the differences between GKE modes.
@@ -286,3 +288,20 @@ To annotate a registered cluster,
 6. Click **Save**.

 **Result:** The annotation does not give the capabilities to the cluster, but it does indicate to Rancher that the cluster has those capabilities.
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+This section lists some of the most common errors that may occur when importing a cluster and provides steps to troubleshoot them.
+
+### AKS
+
+- The following error may occur if local accounts are disabled in your cluster.
+  ```sh
+  Error: Getting static credential is not allowed because this cluster is set to disable local accounts. 
+  ```
+
+  To resolve this issue, enable local accounts before attempting to [import the cluster](#registering-a-cluster) again.
+
+  ```sh
+  az aks update --resource-group <resource-group> --name <cluster-name> --enable-local-accounts
+  ```
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ In order to deploy and run the adapter successfully, you need to ensure its vers

 | Rancher Version | Adapter Version  |
 |-----------------|------------------|
+| v2.9.6          | v104.0.0+up4.0.0 |
+| v2.9.5          | v104.0.0+up4.0.0 |
 | v2.9.4          | v104.0.0+up4.0.0 |
 | v2.9.3          | v104.0.0+up4.0.0 |
 | v2.9.2          | v104.0.0+up4.0.0 |
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ title: AKS Cluster Configuration Reference

 ## Role-based Access Control

-When provisioning an AKS cluster in the Rancher UI, RBAC cannot be disabled. If role-based access control is disabled for the cluster in AKS, the cluster cannot be registered or imported into Rancher.
+When provisioning an AKS cluster in the Rancher UI, RBAC cannot be disabled. If role-based access control is disabled for the cluster in AKS, the cluster cannot be registered or imported into Rancher. In practice, this means that local accounts must be enabled in order to register an AKS cluster.

 Rancher can configure member roles for AKS clusters in the same way as any other cluster. For more information, see the section on [role-based access control.](../../../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/authentication-permissions-and-global-configuration/manage-role-based-access-control-rbac/manage-role-based-access-control-rbac.md)

@@ -10,10 +10,11 @@ Rancher is committed to informing the community of security issues in our produc

 | ID | Description | Date | Resolution |
 |----|-------------|------|------------|
-[CVE-2024-52282](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9c5p-35gj-jqp4) | A medium severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher Manager whereby applications installed via Rancher Manager Apps Catalog store their Helm values directly into the Apps Custom Resource Definition, resulting in any users with GET access to it to be able to read any sensitive information that are contained within the Apps’ values. Additionally, the same information leaks into auditing logs when the audit level is set to equal or above 2. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 19 Nov 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10). |
-[CVE-2024-22036](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher where a cluster or node driver can be used to escape the `chroot` jail and gain root access to the Rancher container itself. In production environments, further privilege escalation is possible based on living off the land within the Rancher container itself. For test and development environments, based on a –privileged Docker container, it is possible to escape the Docker container and gain execution access on the host system. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3), [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) and [v2.7.16](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.16) |
-[CVE-2023-32197](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered whereby Rancher Manager deployments containing Windows nodes have weak Access Control Lists (ACL), allowing `BUILTIN\Users` or `NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users` to view or edit sensitive files which could lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is exclusive to deployments that contain Windows nodes. Linux-only environments are not affected by it. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**.  | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
-[CVE-2022-45157](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered in the way that Rancher stores vSphere's CPI (Cloud Provider Interface) and CSI (Container Storage Interface) credentials used to deploy clusters through the vSphere cloud provider. This issue leads to the vSphere CPI and CSI passwords being stored in a plaintext object inside Rancher. This vulnerability is only applicable to users that deploy clusters in vSphere environments. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2024-52281](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-2v2w-8v8c-wcm9) | A high severity vulnerability was identified within the Rancher UI that allows a malicious actor to perform a Stored XSS attack through the cluster description field. | 15 Jan 2025 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.10.0](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.10.0) |
+| [CVE-2024-52282](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-9c5p-35gj-jqp4) | A medium severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher Manager whereby applications installed via Rancher Manager Apps Catalog store their Helm values directly into the Apps Custom Resource Definition, resulting in any users with GET access to it to be able to read any sensitive information that are contained within the Apps’ values. Additionally, the same information leaks into auditing logs when the audit level is set to equal or above 2. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 19 Nov 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.4](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.4) and [v2.8.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.10). |
+| [CVE-2024-22036](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered within Rancher where a cluster or node driver can be used to escape the `chroot` jail and gain root access to the Rancher container itself. In production environments, further privilege escalation is possible based on living off the land within the Rancher container itself. For test and development environments, based on a –privileged Docker container, it is possible to escape the Docker container and gain execution access on the host system. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3), [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) and [v2.7.16](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.16) |
+| [CVE-2023-32197](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered whereby Rancher Manager deployments containing Windows nodes have weak Access Control Lists (ACL), allowing `BUILTIN\Users` or `NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users` to view or edit sensitive files which could lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is exclusive to deployments that contain Windows nodes. Linux-only environments are not affected by it. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**.  | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
+| [CVE-2022-45157](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v) | A critical severity vulnerability was discovered in the way that Rancher stores vSphere's CPI (Cloud Provider Interface) and CSI (Container Storage Interface) credentials used to deploy clusters through the vSphere cloud provider. This issue leads to the vSphere CPI and CSI passwords being stored in a plaintext object inside Rancher. This vulnerability is only applicable to users that deploy clusters in vSphere environments. **Rancher v2.7 is vulnerable and hasn't received the fix**. | 24 Oct 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.3](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.3) and [v2.8.9](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.9) |
 | [CVE-2024-22030](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4) | A high severity vulnerability was discovered in Rancher's agents that under very specific circumstances allows a malicious actor to take over existing Rancher nodes. The attacker needs to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain in order to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL (the `server-url` of the Rancher cluster). | 19 Sep 2024 | Rancher [v2.9.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.9.2), [v2.8.8](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.8) and [v2.7.15](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.15) |
 | [CVE-2023-32193](https://github.com/rancher/norman/security/advisories/GHSA-r8f4-hv23-6qp6) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.6.13, 2.7.9 and 2.8.1, where multiple Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities can be exploited via the Rancher UI (Norman). | 8 Feb 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.2), [v2.7.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.10) and [v2.6.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.6.14) |
 | [CVE-2023-32192](https://github.com/rancher/apiserver/security/advisories/GHSA-833m-37f7-jq55) | An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.6.13, 2.7.9 and 2.8.1, where multiple Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities can be exploited via the Rancher UI (Apiserver). | 8 Feb 2024 | Rancher [v2.8.2](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.8.2), [v2.7.10](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.7.10) and [v2.6.14](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v2.6.14) |
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Each Rancher version is designed to be compatible with a single version of the w

 | Rancher Version | Webhook Version | Availability in Prime | Availability in Community |
 |-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|
+| v2.9.6          |     v0.5.6      | &check;               | &cross;                   |
+| v2.9.5          |     v0.5.5      | &check;               | &cross;                   |
 | v2.9.4          |     v0.5.4      | &check;               | &cross;                   |
 | v2.9.3          |     v0.5.3      | &check;               | &check;                   |
 | v2.9.2          |     v0.5.2      | &check;               | &check;                   |