Update and restructure hardening guides pages

Signed-off-by: Guilherme Macedo <guilherme.macedo@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Guilherme Macedo
2023-03-08 15:42:46 -03:00
parent cf9222b1ad
commit e3f8deb695
14 changed files with 408 additions and 674 deletions
@@ -1,638 +0,0 @@
---
title: K3s Hardening Guide
---
This document provides prescriptive guidance for how to harden a K3s cluster intended for production, before provisioning it with Rancher. It outlines the configurations and controls required for Center for Information Security (CIS) Kubernetes benchmark controls.
:::note
This hardening guide describes how to secure the nodes in your cluster. We recommended that you follow this guide before you install Kubernetes.
:::
This hardening guide is intended to be used for K3s clusters and associated with the following versions of the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark, Kubernetes, and Rancher:
| Rancher Version | CIS Benchmark Version | Kubernetes Version |
|-----------------|-----------------------|------------------------------|
| Rancher v2.7 | Benchmark v1.23 | Kubernetes v1.22 up to v1.25 |
For more details on how to evaluate a hardened K3s cluster against the official CIS benchmark, refer to the K3s self-assessment guides for specific CIS benchmark versions.
K3s passes a number of the Kubernetes CIS controls without modification, as it applies several security mitigations by default. There are some notable exceptions to this that require manual intervention to fully comply with the CIS Benchmark:
1. K3s doesn't modify the host operating system. Any host-level modifications need to be done manually.
2. Certain CIS policy controls for `NetworkPolicies` and `PodSecurityStandards` (`PodSecurityPolicies` on v1.24 and older) restrict cluster functionality.
You must opt into having K3s configure these policies. Add the appropriate options to your command-line flags or configuration file (enable admission plugins), and manually apply the appropriate policies.
See further for more details.
The first section (1.1) of the CIS Benchmark primarily focuses on pod manifest permissions and ownership. Since everything in the distribution is packaged in a single binary, this section doesn't apply to the core components of K3s.
## Host-level Requirements
### Set kernel parameters
The following `sysctl` configuration is recommended for all nodes type in the cluster. Set the following parameters in `/etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf`:
```ini
vm.panic_on_oom=0
vm.overcommit_memory=1
kernel.panic=10
kernel.panic_on_oops=1
```
Run `sudo sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf` to enable the settings.
## Kubernetes Runtime Requirements
The CIS Benchmark runtime requirements center around pod security (via PSP or PSA), network policies and API Server auditing logs.
### Ensure `protect-kernel-defaults` is set
This is a kubelet flag that will cause the kubelet to exit if the required kernel parameters are unset or are set to values that are different from the kubelet's defaults.
The `protect-kernel-defaults` flag can be set in the cluster configuration in Rancher.
```yaml
spec:
rkeConfig:
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
protect-kernel-defaults: true
```
### Pod Security
By default, K3s doesn't include any pod security or network policies. However, K3s ships with a controller that enforces any network policies you create. K3s doesn't enable auditing by default, so you must manually create audit log configuration and audit policies. By default, K3s enables both the `PodSecurity` and `NodeRestriction` admission controllers, among others.
<Tabs>
<TabItem value="v1.25 and Newer" default>
K3s v1.25 and newer support [Pod Security Admissions (PSAs)](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-admission/) for controlling pod security.
You can specify the Pod Security Admission configuration by setting the `defaultPodSecurityAdmissionConfigurationTemplateName` field in the cluster configuration in Rancher:
```yaml
spec:
defaultPodSecurityAdmissionConfigurationTemplateName: rancher-restricted
```
</TabItem>
<TabItem value="v1.24 and Older">
K3s v1.24 and older support [Pod Security Policies (PSPs)](https://v1-24.docs.kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-policy/) for controlling pod security.
You can enable PSPs by passing the following flags in the cluster configuration in Rancher:
```yaml
spec:
rkeConfig:
machineGlobalConfig:
kube-apiserver-arg:
- enable-admission-plugins=NodeRestriction,PodSecurityPolicy,ServiceAccount
```
This maintains the `NodeRestriction` plugin and enables the `PodSecurityPolicy`.
Once you enable PSPs, you can apply a policy to satisfy the necessary controls described in section 5.2 of the CIS Benchmark.
Here's an example of a compliant PSP:
```yaml
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: restricted-psp
spec:
privileged: false # CIS - 5.2.1
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false # CIS - 5.2.5
requiredDropCapabilities: # CIS - 5.2.7/8/9
- ALL
volumes:
- 'configMap'
- 'emptyDir'
- 'projected'
- 'secret'
- 'downwardAPI'
- 'csi'
- 'persistentVolumeClaim'
- 'ephemeral'
hostNetwork: false # CIS - 5.2.4
hostIPC: false # CIS - 5.2.3
hostPID: false # CIS - 5.2.2
runAsUser:
rule: 'MustRunAsNonRoot' # CIS - 5.2.6
seLinux:
rule: 'RunAsAny'
supplementalGroups:
rule: 'MustRunAs'
ranges:
- min: 1
max: 65535
fsGroup:
rule: 'MustRunAs'
ranges:
- min: 1
max: 65535
readOnlyRootFilesystem: false
```
For the example PSP to be effective, we need to create a `ClusterRole` and a `ClusterRoleBinding`. We also need to include a "system unrestricted policy" for system-level pods that require additional privileges, and an additional policy that allows the necessary sysctls for full functionality of ServiceLB.
If we combine the configuration above with the Network Policy described in the next section, we can place a single file in the `/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/manifests` directory. Here is an example of a `policy.yaml` file:
```yaml
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: restricted-psp
spec:
privileged: false
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
requiredDropCapabilities:
- ALL
volumes:
- 'configMap'
- 'emptyDir'
- 'projected'
- 'secret'
- 'downwardAPI'
- 'csi'
- 'persistentVolumeClaim'
- 'ephemeral'
hostNetwork: false
hostIPC: false
hostPID: false
runAsUser:
rule: 'MustRunAsNonRoot'
seLinux:
rule: 'RunAsAny'
supplementalGroups:
rule: 'MustRunAs'
ranges:
- min: 1
max: 65535
fsGroup:
rule: 'MustRunAs'
ranges:
- min: 1
max: 65535
readOnlyRootFilesystem: false
---
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: system-unrestricted-psp
annotations:
seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/allowedProfileNames: '*'
spec:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: true
allowedCapabilities:
- '*'
fsGroup:
rule: RunAsAny
hostIPC: true
hostNetwork: true
hostPID: true
hostPorts:
- max: 65535
min: 0
privileged: true
runAsUser:
rule: RunAsAny
seLinux:
rule: RunAsAny
supplementalGroups:
rule: RunAsAny
volumes:
- '*'
---
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: svclb-psp
annotations:
seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/allowedProfileNames: '*'
spec:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
allowedCapabilities:
- NET_ADMIN
allowedUnsafeSysctls:
- net.ipv4.ip_forward
- net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding
fsGroup:
rule: RunAsAny
hostPorts:
- max: 65535
min: 0
runAsUser:
rule: RunAsAny
seLinux:
rule: RunAsAny
supplementalGroups:
rule: RunAsAny
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: psp:restricted-psp
rules:
- apiGroups:
- policy
resources:
- podsecuritypolicies
verbs:
- use
resourceNames:
- restricted-psp
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: psp:system-unrestricted-psp
rules:
- apiGroups:
- policy
resources:
- podsecuritypolicies
resourceNames:
- system-unrestricted-psp
verbs:
- use
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: psp:svclb-psp
rules:
- apiGroups:
- policy
resources:
- podsecuritypolicies
resourceNames:
- svclb-psp
verbs:
- use
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: default:restricted-psp
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: psp:restricted-psp
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: system:authenticated
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: system-unrestricted-node-psp-rolebinding
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: psp:system-unrestricted-psp
subjects:
- apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: Group
name: system:nodes
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: system-unrestricted-svc-acct-psp-rolebinding
namespace: kube-system
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: psp:system-unrestricted-psp
subjects:
- apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: Group
name: system:serviceaccounts
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: svclb-psp-rolebinding
namespace: kube-system
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: psp:svclb-psp
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: svclb
---
kind: NetworkPolicy
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: intra-namespace
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
name: kube-system
---
kind: NetworkPolicy
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: intra-namespace
namespace: default
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
name: default
---
kind: NetworkPolicy
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: intra-namespace
namespace: kube-public
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
name: kube-public
```
:::note
The critical Kubernetes additions such as CNI, DNS, and Ingress are run as pods in the `kube-system` namespace. Therefore, this namespace has a less restrictive policy, so that these components can run properly.
:::
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
### Network Policies
CIS requires that all namespaces apply a network policy that reasonably limits traffic into namespaces and pods.
:::note
This is a manual check in the CIS Benchmark. The CIS scan flags the result as a `warning`, because manual inspection is necessary by the cluster operator.
:::
Here's an example of a compliant network policy:
```yaml
kind: NetworkPolicy
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: intra-namespace
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
name: kube-system
```
The active restrictions block DNS unless purposely allowed. Below is a network policy that allows DNS-related traffic:
```yaml
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: default-network-dns-policy
namespace: <NAMESPACE>
spec:
ingress:
- ports:
- port: 53
protocol: TCP
- port: 53
protocol: UDP
podSelector:
matchLabels:
k8s-app: kube-dns
policyTypes:
- Ingress
```
The metrics-server and Traefik ingress controller are blocked by default if network policies aren't created to allow access.
<Tabs>
<TabItem value="v1.21 and Newer" default>
```yaml
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-all-metrics-server
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
k8s-app: metrics-server
ingress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-all-svclbtraefik-ingress
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
svccontroller.k3s.cattle.io/svcname: traefik
ingress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-all-traefik-v121-ingress
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: traefik
ingress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
---
```
</TabItem>
<TabItem value="v1.20 and Older">
```yaml
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-all-metrics-server
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
k8s-app: metrics-server
ingress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-all-svclbtraefik-ingress
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
svccontroller.k3s.cattle.io/svcname: traefik
ingress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-all-traefik-v120-ingress
namespace: kube-system
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: traefik
ingress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
---
```
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
:::note
You must manage network policies as normal for any additional namespaces you create.
:::
### API Server audit configuration
K3s doesn't create the log directory and audit policy by default, as auditing requirements are specific to each user's policies and environment.
If you need a log directory, it must be created before you start K3s. We recommend a restrictive access permission to avoid leaking sensitive information.
```bash
sudo mkdir -p -m 700 /var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/logs
```
The following is a starter audit policy to log request metadata. This policy should be written to a file named `audit.yaml` in the `/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server` directory. Detailed information about policy configuration for the API server can be found in the [official Kubernetes documentation](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug/debug-cluster/audit/).
```yaml
apiVersion: audit.k8s.io/v1
kind: Policy
rules:
- level: Metadata
```
Further configurations are also needed to pass CIS checks. These aren't configured by default in K3s, because they vary based on your environment and needs:
- Ensure that the `--audit-log-path` argument is set.
- Ensure that the `--audit-log-maxage` argument is set to 30 or as appropriate.
- Ensure that the `--audit-log-maxbackup` argument is set to 10 or as appropriate.
- Ensure that the `--audit-log-maxsize` argument is set to 100 or as appropriate.
Combined, to enable and configure audit logs, add the following lines to the K3s cluster configuration file in Rancher:
```yaml
spec:
rkeConfig:
machineGlobalConfig:
kube-apiserver-arg:
- audit-policy-file=/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/audit.yaml # CIS v1.20/v1.23 3.2.1
- audit-log-path=/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/logs/audit.log # CIS v1.20 1.2.21 and CIS v1.23 1.2.19
- audit-log-maxage=30 # CIS v1.20 1.2.22 and CIS v1.23 1.2.20
- audit-log-maxbackup=10 # CIS v1.20 1.2.23 and CIS v1.23 1.2.21
- audit-log-maxsize=100 # CIS v1.20 1.2.24 and CIS v1.23 1.2.22
```
## Reference Hardened K3s Template Configuration
The following reference template configuration is used in Rancher to create a hardened K3s custom cluster based on each CIS control in this guide. This reference doesn't include other required **cluster configuration** directives, which vary based on your environment.
<Tabs groupId="rke2-version">
<TabItem value='v1.25 and Newer' default>
```yaml
apiVersion: provisioning.cattle.io/v1
kind: Cluster
metadata:
name: # Define cluster name
spec:
defaultPodSecurityAdmissionConfigurationTemplateName: rancher-restricted
enableNetworkPolicy: true
kubernetesVersion: # Define K3s version
rkeConfig:
machineGlobalConfig:
kube-apiserver-arg:
- enable-admission-plugins=NodeRestriction,ServiceAccount # CIS 1.2.16, CIS 5.2 and CIS v1.20 - 1.2.13 / CIS v1.23 - 1.2.14
- audit-policy-file=/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/audit.yaml # CIS v1.20/v1.23 3.2.1
- audit-log-path=/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/logs/audit.log # CIS v1.20 1.2.21 and CIS v1.23 1.2.19
- audit-log-maxage=30 # CIS v1.20 1.2.22 and CIS v1.23 1.2.20
- audit-log-maxbackup=10 # CIS v1.20 1.2.23 and CIS v1.23 1.2.21
- audit-log-maxsize=100 # CIS v1.20 1.2.24 and CIS v1.23 1.2.22
- request-timeout=300s # Control CIS v1.20 1.2.26 and CIS v1.23 1.2.23
- service-account-lookup=true # Control CIS v1.23 1.2.24
secrets-encryption: true
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
kubelet-arg:
- make-iptables-util-chains=true # Control 4.2.7
protect-kernel-defaults: true # Control 4.2.6
```
</TabItem>
<TabItem value='v1.22 up to 1.24'>
```yaml
apiVersion: provisioning.cattle.io/v1
kind: Cluster
metadata:
name: # Define cluster name
spec:
enableNetworkPolicy: true
kubernetesVersion: # Define K3s version
rkeConfig:
machineGlobalConfig:
kube-apiserver-arg:
- enable-admission-plugins=NodeRestriction,PodSecurityPolicy,ServiceAccount # CIS 1.2.16, CIS 5.2 and CIS v1.20 - 1.2.13 / CIS v1.23 - 1.2.14
- audit-policy-file=/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/audit.yaml # CIS v1.20/v1.23 3.2.1
- audit-log-path=/var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/logs/audit.log # CIS v1.20 1.2.21 and CIS v1.23 1.2.19
- audit-log-maxage=30 # CIS v1.20 1.2.22 and CIS v1.23 1.2.20
- audit-log-maxbackup=10 # CIS v1.20 1.2.23 and CIS v1.23 1.2.21
- audit-log-maxsize=100 # CIS v1.20 1.2.24 and CIS v1.23 1.2.22
- request-timeout=300s # Control CIS v1.20 1.2.26 and CIS v1.23 1.2.23
- service-account-lookup=true # Control CIS v1.23 1.2.24
secrets-encryption: true
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
kubelet-arg:
- make-iptables-util-chains=true # Control 4.2.7
protect-kernel-defaults: true # Control 4.2.6
```
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
## Conclusion
If you've followed this guide, your K3s custom cluster provisioned by Rancher will be configured to pass the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark. You can review our K3s self-assessment guides to understand how we verified each of the benchmarks and how you can do the same on your cluster.
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: K3s Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.23
---
This document is a companion to the [K3s Hardening Guide](k3s-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden K3s clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [K3s Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/k3s-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden K3s clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: K3s Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.24
---
This document is a companion to the [K3s Hardening Guide](k3s-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden K3s clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [K3s Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/k3s-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden K3s clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: K3s Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.25
---
This document is a companion to the [K3s Hardening Guide](k3s-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden K3s clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [K3s Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/k3s-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden K3s clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -1,725 +0,0 @@
---
title: RKE Hardening Guide
---
This document provides prescriptive guidance for how to harden an RKE cluster intended for production, before provisioning it with Rancher. It outlines the configurations and controls required for Center for Information Security (CIS) Kubernetes benchmark controls.
:::note
This hardening guide describes how to secure the nodes in your cluster. We recommended that you follow this guide before you install Kubernetes.
:::
This hardening guide is intended to be used for RKE clusters and associated with the following versions of the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark, Kubernetes, and Rancher:
| Rancher Version | CIS Benchmark Version | Kubernetes Version |
|-----------------|-----------------------|------------------------------|
| Rancher v2.7 | Benchmark v1.23 | Kubernetes v1.23 up to v1.25 |
For more details on how to evaluate a hardened RKE cluster against the official CIS benchmark, refer to the RKE self-assessment guides for specific CIS benchmark versions.
## Host-level requirements
### Configure Kernel Runtime Parameters
The following `sysctl` configuration is recommended for all nodes type in the cluster. Set the following parameters in `/etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf`:
```ini
vm.overcommit_memory=1
vm.panic_on_oom=0
kernel.panic=10
kernel.panic_on_oops=1
kernel.keys.root_maxbytes=25000000
```
Run `sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf` to enable the settings.
### Configure `etcd` user and group
A user account and group for the **etcd** service is required to be setup before installing RKE.
The **uid** and **gid** for the **etcd** user will be used in the RKE **config.yml** to set the proper permissions for files and directories during installation time.
#### Create `etcd` user and group
To create the **etcd** user and group run the following console commands.
The commands below use `52034` for **uid** and **gid** for example purposes.
Any valid unused **uid** or **gid** could also be used in lieu of `52034`.
```bash
groupadd --gid 52034 etcd
useradd --comment "etcd service account" --uid 52034 --gid 52034 etcd --shell /usr/sbin/nologin
```
Update the RKE **config.yml** with the **uid** and **gid** of the **etcd** user:
```yaml
services:
etcd:
gid: 52034
uid: 52034
```
## Kubernetes runtime requirements
### Configure `default` Service Account
#### Set `automountServiceAccountToken` to `false` for `default` service accounts
Kubernetes provides a default service account which is used by cluster workloads where no specific service account is assigned to the pod.
Where access to the Kubernetes API from a pod is required, a specific service account should be created for that pod, and rights granted to that service account.
The default service account should be configured such that it does not provide a service account token and does not have any explicit rights assignments.
For each namespace including **default** and **kube-system** on a standard RKE install, the **default** service account must include this value:
```yaml
automountServiceAccountToken: false
```
Save the following configuration to a file called `account_update.yaml`.
```yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: default
automountServiceAccountToken: false
```
Create a bash script file called `account_update.sh`.
Be sure to `chmod +x account_update.sh` so the script has execute permissions.
```bash
#!/bin/bash -e
for namespace in $(kubectl get namespaces -A -o=jsonpath="{.items[*]['metadata.name']}"); do
kubectl patch serviceaccount default -n ${namespace} -p "$(cat account_update.yaml)"
done
```
### Configure Network Policy
#### Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined
Running different applications on the same Kubernetes cluster creates a risk of one compromised application attacking a neighboring application. Network segmentation is important to ensure that containers can communicate only with those they are supposed to. A network policy is a specification of how selections of pods are allowed to communicate with each other and other network endpoints.
Network Policies are namespace scoped. When a network policy is introduced to a given namespace, all traffic not allowed by the policy is denied. However, if there are no network policies in a namespace all traffic will be allowed into and out of the pods in that namespace. To enforce network policies, a CNI (container network interface) plugin must be enabled. This guide uses [Canal](https://github.com/projectcalico/canal) to provide the policy enforcement. Additional information about CNI providers can be found [here](https://www.suse.com/c/rancher_blog/comparing-kubernetes-cni-providers-flannel-calico-canal-and-weave/).
Once a CNI provider is enabled on a cluster a default network policy can be applied. For reference purposes a **permissive** example is provided below. If you want to allow all traffic to all pods in a namespace (even if policies are added that cause some pods to be treated as “isolated”), you can create a policy that explicitly allows all traffic in that namespace. Save the following configuration as `default-allow-all.yaml`. Additional [documentation](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/network-policies/) about network policies can be found on the Kubernetes site.
:::note
This `NetworkPolicy` is just an example and is not recommended for production use.
:::
```yaml
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: default-allow-all
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:
- {}
egress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
- Egress
```
Create a bash script file called `apply_networkPolicy_to_all_ns.sh`. Be sure to `chmod +x apply_networkPolicy_to_all_ns.sh` so the script has execute permissions.
```bash
#!/bin/bash -e
for namespace in $(kubectl get namespaces -A -o=jsonpath="{.items[*]['metadata.name']}"); do
kubectl apply -f default-allow-all.yaml -n ${namespace}
done
```
Execute this script to apply the `default-allow-all.yaml` configuration with the **permissive** `NetworkPolicy` to all namespaces.
## Known Limitations
- Rancher **exec shell** and **view logs** for pods are **not** functional in a hardened setup when only a public IP is provided when registering custom nodes. This functionality requires a private IP to be provided when registering the custom nodes.
- When setting `default_pod_security_policy_template_id:` to `restricted` or `restricted-noroot`, based on the pod security policies (PSP) [provided](../../../how-to-guides/new-user-guides/authentication-permissions-and-global-configuration/create-pod-security-policies.md) by Rancher, Rancher creates **RoleBindings** and **ClusterRoleBindings** on the default service accounts. The CIS v1.6/v1.20/v1.23 check 5.1.5 requires that the default service accounts have no roles or cluster roles bound to it apart from the defaults. In addition, the default service accounts should be configured such that it does not provide a service account token and does not have any explicit rights assignments.
## Known Issues
The following are controls that RKE currently does not pass. Each gap will be explained and whether it can be passed through manual operator intervention or if it will be addressed in a future release.
<Tabs groupId="rke-version">
<TabItem value='v1.25 and Newer' default>
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.3 - Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host process ID namespace (Automated)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.4 - Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host IPC namespace (Automated)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.5 - Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host network namespace (Automated)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.6 - Minimize the admission of containers with allowPrivilegeEscalation (Automated)
**Rationale**
Those controls are defined to evaluate certain PodSecurityPolicy resources in the benchmark, but the PodSecurityPolicy API is removed starting in Kubernetes v1.25, therefore those controls fail in the scan.
**Remediation**
Pod Security Admission is configured by setting the Pod Security Admission Configuration Template (PSACT) `rancher-restricted` in the cluster to enforce the restriction on applicable namespaces.
Due to the lack of utilizing PSA in the current version of the benchmark, the above controls will not be addressed until an updated version of the benchmark is available.
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.3.2 - Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Rationale**
The benchmark scanner expects to see one or more `networkpolicy` resources in every namespace.
**Remediation**
This is a known issue that rancher-cis-benchmark fails on validating this control. See [issue](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/issues/40648).
</TabItem>
<TabItem value='v1.22 up to v1.24'>
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.3.2 - Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Rationale**
The benchmark scanner expects to see one or more `networkpolicy` resources in every namespace.
**Remediation**
This is a known issue that rancher-cis-benchmark fails on validating this control. See [issue](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/issues/40648).
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
## Reference Hardened RKE `cluster.yml` Configuration
The reference `cluster.yml` is used by the RKE CLI that provides the configuration needed to achieve a hardened installation of Rancher Kubernetes Engine (RKE). RKE [documentation](https://rancher.com/docs/rke/latest/en/installation/) provides additional details about the configuration items. This reference `cluster.yml` does not include the required **nodes** directive which will vary depending on your environment. Documentation for node configuration in RKE can be found [here](https://rancher.com/docs/rke/latest/en/config-options/nodes/).
<Tabs groupId="rke-version">
<TabItem value='v1.25 and Newer' default>
:::note
If you intend to import an RKE cluster into Rancher, please consult the documentation for how to configure the Pod Security Admission to add Rancher's namespaces to the exemption list.
:::
```yaml
# If you intend to deploy Kubernetes in an air-gapped environment,
# please consult the documentation on how to configure custom RKE images.
nodes: []
kubernetes_version: v1.25.6-rancher2-1
services:
etcd:
uid: 52034
gid: 52034
kube-api:
secrets_encryption_config:
enabled: true
audit_log:
enabled: true
event_rate_limit:
enabled: true
pod_security_configuration: restricted
kube-controller:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
kubelet:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
protect-kernel-defaults: "true"
generate_serving_certificate: true
addons: |
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: default-allow-all
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:
- {}
egress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
- Egress
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: default
automountServiceAccountToken: false
```
</TabItem>
<TabItem value='v1.22 up to v1.24'>
```yaml
# If you intend to deploy Kubernetes in an air-gapped environment,
# please consult the documentation on how to configure custom RKE images.
nodes: []
kubernetes_version: v1.24.10-rancher3-1
services:
etcd:
uid: 52034
gid: 52034
kube-api:
secrets_encryption_config:
enabled: true
audit_log:
enabled: true
event_rate_limit:
enabled: true
pod_security_policy: true
kube-controller:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
kubelet:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
protect-kernel-defaults: true
generate_serving_certificate: true
addons: |
# Upstream Kubernetes restricted PSP policy
# https://github.com/kubernetes/website/blob/564baf15c102412522e9c8fc6ef2b5ff5b6e766c/content/en/examples/policy/restricted-psp.yaml
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: restricted-noroot
spec:
privileged: false
# Required to prevent escalations to root.
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
requiredDropCapabilities:
- ALL
# Allow core volume types.
volumes:
- 'configMap'
- 'emptyDir'
- 'projected'
- 'secret'
- 'downwardAPI'
# Assume that ephemeral CSI drivers & persistentVolumes set up by the cluster admin are safe to use.
- 'csi'
- 'persistentVolumeClaim'
- 'ephemeral'
hostNetwork: false
hostIPC: false
hostPID: false
runAsUser:
# Require the container to run without root privileges.
rule: 'MustRunAsNonRoot'
seLinux:
# This policy assumes the nodes are using AppArmor rather than SELinux.
rule: 'RunAsAny'
supplementalGroups:
rule: 'MustRunAs'
ranges:
# Forbid adding the root group.
- min: 1
max: 65535
fsGroup:
rule: 'MustRunAs'
ranges:
# Forbid adding the root group.
- min: 1
max: 65535
readOnlyRootFilesystem: false
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: psp:restricted-noroot
rules:
- apiGroups:
- extensions
resourceNames:
- restricted-noroot
resources:
- podsecuritypolicies
verbs:
- use
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: psp:restricted-noroot
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: psp:restricted-noroot
subjects:
- apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: Group
name: system:serviceaccounts
- apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: Group
name: system:authenticated
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: default-allow-all
spec:
podSelector: {}
ingress:
- {}
egress:
- {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
- Egress
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: default
automountServiceAccountToken: false
```
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
## Reference Hardened RKE Template Configuration
The reference RKE template provides the configuration needed to achieve a hardened installation of Kubernetes. RKE templates are used to provision Kubernetes and define Rancher settings. Follow the Rancher [documentation](../../../pages-for-subheaders/installation-and-upgrade.md) for additional installation and RKE template details.
<Tabs groupId="rke-version">
<TabItem value='v1.25 and Newer' default>
```yaml
#
# Cluster Config
#
default_pod_security_admission_configuration_template_name: rancher-restricted
docker_root_dir: /var/lib/docker
enable_cluster_alerting: false
enable_cluster_monitoring: false
enable_network_policy: true
local_cluster_auth_endpoint:
enabled: true
name: ''
#
# Rancher Config
#
rancher_kubernetes_engine_config:
addon_job_timeout: 45
authentication:
strategy: x509
dns:
nodelocal:
ip_address: ''
node_selector: null
update_strategy: {}
enable_cri_dockerd: false
ignore_docker_version: true
#
# # Currently only nginx ingress provider is supported.
# # To disable ingress controller, set `provider: none`
# # To enable ingress on specific nodes, use the node_selector, eg:
# provider: nginx
# node_selector:
# app: ingress
#
ingress:
default_backend: false
default_ingress_class: true
http_port: 0
https_port: 0
provider: nginx
kubernetes_version: v1.25.6-rancher2-1
monitoring:
provider: metrics-server
replicas: 1
#
# If you are using calico on AWS
#
# network:
# plugin: calico
# calico_network_provider:
# cloud_provider: aws
#
# # To specify flannel interface
#
# network:
# plugin: flannel
# flannel_network_provider:
# iface: eth1
#
# # To specify flannel interface for canal plugin
#
# network:
# plugin: canal
# canal_network_provider:
# iface: eth1
#
network:
mtu: 0
options:
flannel_backend_type: vxlan
plugin: canal
rotate_encryption_key: false
#
# services:
# kube-api:
# service_cluster_ip_range: 10.43.0.0/16
# kube-controller:
# cluster_cidr: 10.42.0.0/16
# service_cluster_ip_range: 10.43.0.0/16
# kubelet:
# cluster_domain: cluster.local
# cluster_dns_server: 10.43.0.10
#
services:
scheduler:
extra_args:
tls-cipher-suites: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
bind-address: 127.0.0.1
etcd:
backup_config:
enabled: true
interval_hours: 12
retention: 6
safe_timestamp: false
timeout: 300
creation: 12h
extra_args:
election-timeout: 5000
heartbeat-interval: 500
retention: 72h
snapshot: false
uid: 52034
gid: 52034
kube_api:
always_pull_images: false
audit_log:
enabled: true
event_rate_limit:
enabled: true
pod_security_policy: false
secrets_encryption_config:
enabled: true
service_node_port_range: 30000-32767
kube-controller:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
tls-cipher-suites: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
bind-address: 127.0.0.1
kubelet:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
protect-kernel-defaults: true
tls-cipher-suites: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
fail_swap_on: false
generate_serving_certificate: true
ssh_agent_auth: false
upgrade_strategy:
max_unavailable_controlplane: '1'
max_unavailable_worker: 10%
windows_prefered_cluster: false
```
</TabItem>
<TabItem value='v1.22 up to v1.24'>
```yaml
#
# Cluster Config
#
default_pod_security_policy_template_id: restricted-noroot
docker_root_dir: /var/lib/docker
enable_cluster_alerting: false
enable_cluster_monitoring: false
enable_network_policy: true
local_cluster_auth_endpoint:
enabled: true
name: ''
#
# Rancher Config
#
rancher_kubernetes_engine_config:
addon_job_timeout: 45
authentication:
strategy: x509
dns:
nodelocal:
ip_address: ''
node_selector: null
update_strategy: {}
enable_cri_dockerd: false
ignore_docker_version: true
#
# # Currently only nginx ingress provider is supported.
# # To disable ingress controller, set `provider: none`
# # To enable ingress on specific nodes, use the node_selector, eg:
# provider: nginx
# node_selector:
# app: ingress
#
ingress:
default_backend: false
default_ingress_class: true
http_port: 0
https_port: 0
provider: nginx
kubernetes_version: v1.24.10-rancher3-1
monitoring:
provider: metrics-server
replicas: 1
#
# If you are using calico on AWS
#
# network:
# plugin: calico
# calico_network_provider:
# cloud_provider: aws
#
# # To specify flannel interface
#
# network:
# plugin: flannel
# flannel_network_provider:
# iface: eth1
#
# # To specify flannel interface for canal plugin
#
# network:
# plugin: canal
# canal_network_provider:
# iface: eth1
#
network:
mtu: 0
options:
flannel_backend_type: vxlan
plugin: canal
rotate_encryption_key: false
#
# services:
# kube-api:
# service_cluster_ip_range: 10.43.0.0/16
# kube-controller:
# cluster_cidr: 10.42.0.0/16
# service_cluster_ip_range: 10.43.0.0/16
# kubelet:
# cluster_domain: cluster.local
# cluster_dns_server: 10.43.0.10
#
services:
scheduler:
extra_args:
tls-cipher-suites: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
bind-address: 127.0.0.1
etcd:
backup_config:
enabled: true
interval_hours: 12
retention: 6
safe_timestamp: false
timeout: 300
creation: 12h
extra_args:
election-timeout: 5000
heartbeat-interval: 500
retention: 72h
snapshot: false
uid: 52034
gid: 52034
kube_api:
always_pull_images: false
audit_log:
enabled: true
event_rate_limit:
enabled: true
pod_security_policy: true
secrets_encryption_config:
enabled: true
service_node_port_range: 30000-32767
kube-controller:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
tls-cipher-suites: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
bind-address: 127.0.0.1
kubelet:
extra_args:
feature-gates: RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
protect-kernel-defaults: true
tls-cipher-suites: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
fail_swap_on: false
generate_serving_certificate: true
ssh_agent_auth: false
upgrade_strategy:
max_unavailable_controlplane: '1'
max_unavailable_worker: 10%
windows_prefered_cluster: false
```
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
## Reference Hardened **cloud-config** Configuration
A **cloud-config** configuration file is generally used in cloud infrastructure environments to allow for configuration management of compute instances. The reference config configures SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES), openSUSE Leap, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Ubuntu operating system level settings needed before installing Kubernetes.
### Reference Hardened **cloud-config** for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 (SLES 15) and openSUSE Leap 15
```yaml
#cloud-config
system_info:
default_user:
groups:
- docker
write_files:
- path: "/etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf"
owner: root:root
permissions: '0644'
content: |
vm.overcommit_memory=1
vm.panic_on_oom=0
kernel.panic=10
kernel.panic_on_oops=1
kernel.keys.root_maxbytes=25000000
package_update: true
ssh_pwauth: false
runcmd:
# Docker should already be installed in SLES 15 SP3
- zypper install docker containerd
- systemctl daemon-reload
- systemctl enable docker.service
- systemctl start --no-block docker.service
- sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf
- groupadd --gid 52034 etcd
- useradd --comment "etcd service account" --uid 52034 --gid 52034 etcd --shell /usr/sbin/nologin
```
### Reference Hardened **cloud-config** for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (RHEL 8) and Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
```yaml
#cloud-config
system_info:
default_user:
groups:
- docker
write_files:
- path: "/etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf"
owner: root:root
permissions: '0644'
content: |
vm.overcommit_memory=1
vm.panic_on_oom=0
kernel.panic=10
kernel.panic_on_oops=1
kernel.keys.root_maxbytes=25000000
package_update: true
ssh_pwauth: false
runcmd:
# Install Docker from Rancher's Docker installation scripts - github.com/rancher/install-docker
- curl https://releases.rancher.com/install-docker/20.10.sh | sh
- sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf
- groupadd --gid 52034 etcd
- useradd --comment "etcd service account" --uid 52034 --gid 52034 etcd --shell /usr/sbin/nologin
```
## Conclusion
If you have followed this guide, your RKE custom cluster provisioned by Rancher will be configured to pass the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark. You can review our RKE self-assessment guides to understand how we verified each of the benchmarks and how you can do the same on your cluster.
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: RKE Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.23
---
This document is a companion to the [RKE Hardening Guide](rke1-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [RKE Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/rke1-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -2923,7 +2923,7 @@ in the Kubernetes cluster.
### 5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Result:** fail
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Follow the documentation and create NetworkPolicy objects as you need them.
@@ -2968,7 +2968,7 @@ echo "true"
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (Forbidden): networkpolicies.networking.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:cis-operator-system:cis-serviceaccount" cannot list resource "networkpolicies" in API group "networking.k8s.io" in the namespace "cattle-fleet-system" false
true
```
## 5.4 Secrets Management
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: RKE Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.24
---
This document is a companion to the [RKE Hardening Guide](rke1-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [RKE Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/rke1-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -2923,7 +2923,7 @@ in the Kubernetes cluster.
### 5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Result:** fail
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Follow the documentation and create NetworkPolicy objects as you need them.
@@ -2968,7 +2968,7 @@ echo "true"
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (Forbidden): networkpolicies.networking.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:cis-operator-system:cis-serviceaccount" cannot list resource "networkpolicies" in API group "networking.k8s.io" in the namespace "cattle-fleet-system" false
true
```
## 5.4 Secrets Management
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: RKE Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.25
---
This document is a companion to the [RKE Hardening Guide](rke1-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [RKE Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/rke1-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -2924,7 +2924,7 @@ in the Kubernetes cluster.
### 5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Result:** fail
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Follow the documentation and create NetworkPolicy objects as you need them.
@@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@ echo "true"
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (Forbidden): networkpolicies.networking.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:cis-operator-system:cis-serviceaccount" cannot list resource "networkpolicies" in API group "networking.k8s.io" in the namespace "cattle-fleet-system" false
true
```
## 5.4 Secrets Management
@@ -1,353 +0,0 @@
---
title: RKE2 Hardening Guide
---
This document provides prescriptive guidance for how to harden an RKE2 cluster intended for production, before provisioning it with Rancher. It outlines the configurations and controls required for Center for Information Security (CIS) Kubernetes benchmark controls.
:::note
This hardening guide describes how to secure the nodes in your cluster. We recommended that you follow this guide before you install Kubernetes.
:::
This hardening guide is intended to be used for RKE2 clusters and associated with the following versions of the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark, Kubernetes, and Rancher:
| Rancher Version | CIS Benchmark Version | Kubernetes Version |
|-----------------|-----------------------|------------------------------|
| Rancher v2.7 | Benchmark v1.23 | Kubernetes v1.22 up to v1.25 |
For more details on how to evaluate a hardened RKE2 cluster against the official CIS benchmark, refer to the RKE2 self-assessment guides for specific CIS benchmark versions.
RKE2 passes a number of the Kubernetes CIS controls without modification, as it applies several security mitigations by default. There are some notable exceptions to this that require manual intervention to fully comply with the CIS Benchmark:
1. RKE2 will not modify the host operating system. Therefore, you, the operator, must make a few host-level modifications.
2. Certain CIS controls for Network Policies and Pod Security Standards (or Pod Security Policies (PSP) on RKE2 versions prior to v1.25) will restrict the functionality of the cluster. You must opt into having RKE2 configure these for you. To help ensure these requirements are met, RKE2 can be started with the profile flag set to `cis-1.5`, `cis-1.6`, or `cis-1.23`.
## Host-level requirements
There are two areas of host-level requirements: kernel parameters and etcd process/directory configuration. These are outlined in this section.
### Set kernel parameters
The following `sysctl` configuration is recommended for all nodes type in the cluster. Set the following parameters in `/etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf`:
```ini
vm.panic_on_oom=0
vm.overcommit_memory=1
kernel.panic=10
kernel.panic_on_oops=1
```
Run `sudo sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/90-kubelet.conf` to enable the settings.
### Ensure etcd is configured properly
The CIS Benchmark requires that the etcd data directory be owned by the `etcd` user and group. This implicitly requires the etcd process run as the host-level `etcd` user. To achieve this, RKE2 takes several steps when started with a valid `cis-1.xx` profile:
1. Check that the `etcd` user and group exists on the host. If they don't, exit with an error.
2. Create etcd's data directory with `etcd` as the user and group owner.
3. Ensure the etcd process is ran as the `etcd` user and group by setting the etcd static pod's `SecurityContext` appropriately.
To meet the above requirements, you must:
#### Create the etcd user
On some Linux distributions, the `useradd` command will not create a group. The `-U` flag is included below to account for that. This flag tells `useradd` to create a group with the same name as the user.
```bash
sudo useradd -r -c "etcd user" -s /sbin/nologin -M etcd -U
```
## Kubernetes runtime requirements
### Ensure `protect-kernel-defaults` is set
This is a kubelet flag that will cause the kubelet to exit if the required kernel parameters are unset or are set to values that are different from the kubelet's defaults.
Both `protect-kernel-defaults` and `profile` flags can be set in the RKE2 template configuration file.
When the `profile` flag is set, RKE2 will set the flag to `true` if it is unset.
```yaml
spec:
rkeConfig:
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
profile: cis-1.23
protect-kernel-defaults: true
```
The runtime requirements to pass the CIS Benchmark are centered around pod security and network policies. Most of this is automatically handled by RKE2 when using a valid `cis-1.XX` profile, but some additional operator intervention is required. These are outlined in this section.
### PodSecurity
RKE2 always runs with some amount of pod security.
<Tabs groupId="rke2-version">
<TabItem value='v1.25 and Newer' default>
On v1.25 and newer, [Pod Security Admission (PSA)](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-admission/) are used for pod security.
Below is the minimum necessary configuration needed for hardening RKE2 to pass CIS v1.23 hardened profile `rke2-cis-1.23-profile-hardened` available in Rancher.
```yaml
spec:
defaultPodSecurityAdmissionConfigurationTemplateName: rancher-restricted
rkeConfig:
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
profile: cis-1.23
protect-kernel-defaults: true
```
When both the `defaultPodSecurityAdmissionConfigurationTemplateName` and `profile` flags are set, Rancher and RKE2 does the following:
1. Checks that host-level requirements have been met. If they haven't, RKE2 will exit with a fatal error describing the unmet requirements.
2. Applies network policies that allow the cluster to pass associated controls.
3. Configures the Pod Security Admission Controller with the Pod Security Admission Configuration Template (PSACT) `rancher-restricted`, to enforce restricted mode in all namespaces, except the ones in the PSACT's exemption list.
These namespaces are exempted to allow system pods to run without restrictions, which is required for proper operation of the cluster.
</TabItem>
<TabItem value='v1.22 up to v1.24'>
On Kubernetes v1.22 to v1.24, the `PodSecurityPolicy` admission controller is always enabled.
Below is the minimum necessary configuration needed for hardening RKE2 to pass CIS v1.23 hardened profile `rke2-cis-1.23-profile-hardened` available in Rancher.
:::note
In the following example the profile is set to `cis-1.6` which is the value defined in the upstream RKE2, but the cluster is actually configured to pass the CIS v1.23 hardened profile
:::
```yaml
spec:
defaultPodSecurityPolicyTemplateName: restricted-noroot
rkeConfig:
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
profile: cis-1.6
protect-kernel-defaults: true
```
When both the `defaultPodSecurityPolicyTemplateName` and `profile` flags are set, Rancher and RKE2 does the following:
1. Checks that host-level requirements have been met. If they haven't, RKE2 will exit with a fatal error describing the unmet requirements.
2. Applies network policies that allow the cluster to pass associated controls.
3. Configures runtime pod security policies that allow the cluster to pass associated controls.
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
:::note
The Kubernetes control plane components and critical additions such as CNI, DNS, and Ingress are ran as pods in the `kube-system` namespace. Therefore, this namespace will have a policy that is less restrictive so that these components can run properly.
:::
### NetworkPolicies
When ran with a valid `cis-1.XX` profile, RKE2 will put `NetworkPolicies` in place that passes the CIS Benchmark for Kubernetes' built-in namespaces. These namespaces are: `kube-system`, `kube-public`, `kube-node-lease`, and `default`.
The `NetworkPolicy` used will only allow pods within the same namespace to talk to each other. The notable exception to this is that it allows DNS requests to be resolved.
:::caution Operator Intervention Required
Operators must manage network policies as normal for additional namespaces that are created.
:::
### Configure `default` service account
**Set `automountServiceAccountToken` to `false` for `default` service accounts**
Kubernetes provides a `default` service account which is used by cluster workloads where no specific service account is assigned to the pod. Where access to the Kubernetes API from a pod is required, a specific service account should be created for that pod, and rights granted to that service account. The `default` service account should be configured such that it does not provide a service account token and does not have any explicit rights assignments.
For each namespace including `default` and `kube-system` on a standard RKE2 install, the `default` service account must include this value:
```yaml
automountServiceAccountToken: false
```
For namespaces created by the cluster operator, the following script and configuration file can be used to configure the `default` service account.
The configuration bellow must be saved to a file called `account_update.yaml`.
```yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: default
automountServiceAccountToken: false
```
Create a bash script file called `account_update.sh`. Be sure to `sudo chmod +x account_update.sh` so the script has execute permissions.
```bash
#!/bin/bash -e
for namespace in $(kubectl get namespaces -A -o=jsonpath="{.items[*]['metadata.name']}"); do
echo -n "Patching namespace $namespace - "
kubectl patch serviceaccount default -n ${namespace} -p "$(cat account_update.yaml)"
done
```
Execute this script to apply the `account_update.yaml` configuration to `default` service account in all namespaces.
### API Server audit configuration
CIS requirements 1.2.19 to 1.2.22 are related to configuring audit logs for the API Server. When RKE2 is started with the `profile` flag set, it will automatically configure hardened `--audit-log-` parameters in the API Server to pass those CIS checks.
RKE2's default audit policy is configured to not log requests in the API Server. This is done to allow cluster operators flexibility to customize an audit policy that suits their auditing requirements and needs, as these are specific to each users' environment and policies.
A default audit policy is created by RKE2 when started with the `profile` flag set. The policy is defined in `/etc/rancher/rke2/audit-policy.yaml`.
```yaml
apiVersion: audit.k8s.io/v1
kind: Policy
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
rules:
- level: None
```
## Known issues
The following are controls that RKE2 currently does not pass. Each gap will be explained and whether it can be passed through manual operator intervention or if it will be addressed in a future release.
<Tabs groupId="rke2-version">
<TabItem value='v1.25 and Newer' default>
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.2 - Minimize the admission of privileged containers (Manual)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.8 - Minimize the admission of containers with the NET_RAW capability (Automated)
**Rationale**
The benchmark scanner expects to see a PodSecurityPolicy resource named `global-restricted-psp` in the cluster. However, the PodSecurityPolicy resource Rancher creates is named `restricted-noroot-psp`.
**Remediation**
Create a PodSecurityPolicy resource named `global-restricted-psp` by cloning `restricted-noroot-psp`.
</TabItem>
<TabItem value='v1.22 up to v1.24'>
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.2 - Minimize the admission of privileged containers (Manual)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.3 - Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host process ID namespace (Automated)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.5 - Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host network namespace (Automated)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.6 - Minimize the admission of containers with allowPrivilegeEscalation (Automated)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.7 - Minimize the admission of root containers (Automated)
#### CIS v1.23 - Control 5.2.8 - Minimize the admission of containers with the NET_RAW capability (Automated)
**Rationale**
Those controls are defined to evaluate certain PodSecurityPolicy resources in the benchmark, but the PodSecurityPolicy API is removed starting in Kubernetes v1.25, therefore those controls fail in the scan.
**Remediation**
Pod Security Admission is configured by setting the Pod Security Admission Configuration Template (PSACT) `rancher-restricted` in the cluster to enforce the restriction on applicable namespaces.
Due to the lack of utilizing PSA in the current version of the benchmark, the above controls will not be addressed until an updated version of the benchmark is available.
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
## Reference Hardened RKE2 Template Configuration
The reference template configuration is used in Rancher to create a hardened RKE2 custom cluster. This reference does not include other required **cluster configuration** directives which will vary depending on your environment.
<Tabs groupId="rke2-version">
<TabItem value='v1.25 and Newer' default>
```yaml
apiVersion: provisioning.cattle.io/v1
kind: Cluster
metadata:
name: rke2-125-new
namespace: fleet-default
spec:
defaultPodSecurityAdmissionConfigurationTemplateName: rancher-restricted
kubernetesVersion: v1.25.6+rke2r1
rkeConfig:
etcd:
disableSnapshots: false
snapshotRetention: 5
snapshotScheduleCron: 0 */5 * * *
machineGlobalConfig:
cni: calico
disable-kube-proxy: false
etcd-expose-metrics: false
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
profile: cis-1.23
protect-kernel-defaults: true
upgradeStrategy:
controlPlaneConcurrency: '1'
controlPlaneDrainOptions:
deleteEmptyDirData: true
disableEviction: false
enabled: false
force: false
gracePeriod: -1
ignoreDaemonSets: true
skipWaitForDeleteTimeoutSeconds: 0
timeout: 120
workerConcurrency: '1'
workerDrainOptions:
deleteEmptyDirData: true
disableEviction: false
enabled: false
force: false
gracePeriod: -1
ignoreDaemonSets: true
skipWaitForDeleteTimeoutSeconds: 0
timeout: 120
```
</TabItem>
<TabItem value='v1.22 up to 1.24'>
```yaml
apiVersion: provisioning.cattle.io/v1
kind: Cluster
metadata:
name: rke2-v124
namespace: fleet-default
spec:
defaultPodSecurityPolicyTemplateName: restricted-noroot
kubernetesVersion: v1.24.10+rke2r1
rkeConfig:
etcd:
disableSnapshots: false
snapshotRetention: 5
snapshotScheduleCron: 0 */5 * * *
machineGlobalConfig:
cni: calico
disable-kube-proxy: false
etcd-expose-metrics: false
machineSelectorConfig:
- config:
profile: cis-1.6
protect-kernel-defaults: true
upgradeStrategy:
controlPlaneConcurrency: '1'
controlPlaneDrainOptions:
deleteEmptyDirData: true
disableEviction: false
enabled: false
force: false
gracePeriod: -1
ignoreDaemonSets: true
skipWaitForDeleteTimeoutSeconds: 0
timeout: 120
workerConcurrency: '1'
workerDrainOptions:
deleteEmptyDirData: true
disableEviction: false
enabled: false
force: false
gracePeriod: -1
ignoreDaemonSets: true
skipWaitForDeleteTimeoutSeconds: 0
timeout: 120
```
</TabItem>
</Tabs>
## Conclusion
If you have followed this guide, your RKE2 custom cluster provisioned by Rancher will be configured to pass the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark. You can review our RKE2 self-assessment guides to understand how we verified each of the benchmarks and how you can do the same on your cluster.
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: RKE2 Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.23
---
This document is a companion to the [RKE2 Hardening Guide](rke2-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE2 clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [RKE2 Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/rke2-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE2 clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -2814,7 +2814,7 @@ for every namespace which contains user workloads.
### 5.2.2 Minimize the admission of privileged containers (Manual)
**Result:** fail
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Add policies to each namespace in the cluster which has user workloads to restrict the
@@ -2835,7 +2835,7 @@ kubectl get psp global-restricted-psp -o json | jq -r '.spec.runAsUser.rule'
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (NotFound): podsecuritypolicies.policy "global-restricted-psp" not found
MustRunAsNonRoot
```
### 5.2.3 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host process ID namespace (Automated)
@@ -2976,7 +2976,7 @@ kubectl get psp -o json | jq .items[] | jq -r 'select((.spec.allowPrivilegeEscal
### 5.2.8 Minimize the admission of containers with the NET_RAW capability (Automated)
**Result:** fail
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Add policies to each namespace in the cluster which has user workloads to restrict the
@@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ kubectl get psp global-restricted-psp -o json | jq -r .spec.requiredDropCapabili
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (NotFound): podsecuritypolicies.policy "global-restricted-psp" not found
ALL
```
### 5.2.9 Minimize the admission of containers with added capabilities (Automated)
@@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ kubectl get pods --all-namespaces --selector='k8s-app in (calico-node, canal, ci
### 5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Result:** warn
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Follow the documentation and create NetworkPolicy objects as you need them.
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@ echo "true"
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (Forbidden): networkpolicies.networking.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:cis-operator-system:cis-serviceaccount" cannot list resource "networkpolicies" in API group "networking.k8s.io" in the namespace "kube-system" false
true
```
## 5.4 Secrets Management
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: RKE2 Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.24
---
This document is a companion to the [RKE2 Hardening Guide](rke2-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE2 clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [RKE2 Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/rke2-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE2 clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -2814,7 +2814,7 @@ for every namespace which contains user workloads.
### 5.2.2 Minimize the admission of privileged containers (Manual)
**Result:** fail
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Add policies to each namespace in the cluster which has user workloads to restrict the
@@ -2835,7 +2835,7 @@ kubectl get psp global-restricted-psp -o json | jq -r '.spec.runAsUser.rule'
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (NotFound): podsecuritypolicies.policy "global-restricted-psp" not found
MustRunAsNonRoot
```
### 5.2.3 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host process ID namespace (Automated)
@@ -2976,7 +2976,7 @@ kubectl get psp -o json | jq .items[] | jq -r 'select((.spec.allowPrivilegeEscal
### 5.2.8 Minimize the admission of containers with the NET_RAW capability (Automated)
**Result:** fail
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Add policies to each namespace in the cluster which has user workloads to restrict the
@@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ kubectl get psp global-restricted-psp -o json | jq -r .spec.requiredDropCapabili
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (NotFound): podsecuritypolicies.policy "global-restricted-psp" not found
ALL
```
### 5.2.9 Minimize the admission of containers with added capabilities (Automated)
@@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ kubectl get pods --all-namespaces --selector='k8s-app in (calico-node, canal, ci
### 5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Result:** warn
**Result:** pass
**Remediation:**
Follow the documentation and create NetworkPolicy objects as you need them.
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@ echo "true"
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (Forbidden): networkpolicies.networking.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:cis-operator-system:cis-serviceaccount" cannot list resource "networkpolicies" in API group "networking.k8s.io" in the namespace "kube-system" false
true
```
## 5.4 Secrets Management
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
title: RKE2 Self-Assessment Guide - CIS Benchmark v1.23 - K8s v1.25
---
This document is a companion to the [RKE2 Hardening Guide](rke2-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE2 clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This document is a companion to the [RKE2 Hardening Guide](../../../../pages-for-subheaders/rke2-hardening-guide.md), which provides prescriptive guidance on how to harden RKE2 clusters that are running in production and managed by Rancher. This benchmark guide helps you evaluate the security of a hardened cluster against each control in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
This guide corresponds to the following versions of Rancher, CIS Benchmarks, and Kubernetes:
@@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ kubectl get pods --all-namespaces --selector='k8s-app in (calico-node, canal, ci
### 5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Automated)
**Result:** warn
**Result:** true
**Remediation:**
Follow the documentation and create NetworkPolicy objects as you need them.
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@ echo "true"
**Returned Value**:
```console
Error from server (Forbidden): networkpolicies.networking.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:cis-operator-system:cis-serviceaccount" cannot list resource "networkpolicies" in API group "networking.k8s.io" in the namespace "kube-system" false
true
```
## 5.4 Secrets Management